Legal Opinion

Cannada v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1891No. 7282PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Lamar. Tried below before Hon. E. D. McClellan. The opinion sufficiently states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for the theft of a horse. There are two bills of exception in the record before us. One is as to the admission of the proof of the *538confession of the defendant to the sheriff, Chaney. This evidence of the confession was admissible, because it appears from the statement in the bill of exceptions that the sheriff did hot induce the confession by any promise or hope of favor held out to the defendant. The doctrine now held in regard to confessions is ‘ ‘ that there must be a positive promise made or sanctioned by a person in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DixsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. George v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Oxier v. United StatesCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1896
  4. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API