Legal Opinion

State v. Baughman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 28, 2010No. 100,604PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Larson, J.:

This is Clifford Baughman’s direct appeal from his conviction in a jury trial of aggravated indecent liberties with a child in violation of K.S.A. 21-3504(a)(l).

Baughman alleges on appeal that the district court erred (1) in giving the “deadlocked” jury instruction over his specific objection; (2) in failing to require an election or giving an instruction in a multiple acts situation; (3) by excluding evidence of the victim’s previous sexual history for the purpose of impeachment; and (4) by refusing to remove Baughman’s appointed counsel on the morning of the jury trial.

We reverse…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. State v. ApplebySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. State v. VoylesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. SaltsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. McKissackSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API