Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Moody

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 15, 1829Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action qui tam the declaration must conclude with contra formam statuti, or something equivalent; it is not sufficient to say an action hath accrued to the plaintiff* (f by force of laws and acts aforesaid.”

This was a qui tam action brought by the captain of a militia company against the selectmen of Newbury, to recover the penalty of $ 50 for not paying over to the plaintiff a proportion of $ 3000 paid by conditional exempts to the treasurer of New-bury, to be appropriated according to law. The action was founded on St. 1822, c. 102, § 7. The declaration recited the title and some of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1812
  2. Sears v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1812

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API