Legal Opinion

O'Bannon v. Roberts' Heirs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 10, 1834PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Circuit Court for Shelby County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Nicholas

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The heirs and administrator of Roberts filed their bill against Q’Bannon, to recover compensation for the use of a small tract of land, which descended to them and the wife of O’Bannon, from Roberts, their father, and which O’Bannon had occupied since his death, and for some years previous thereto. The occupancy, during the life time of Roberts, they allege to have been under a lease, the terms of which they do not know, and require a discovery.

O’Bannon answered, that he originally took possession under a lease from Roberts, but that before-its…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ward v. Ward's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Ball v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
  3. Kelly's Ex'or v. PettusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Eastwood v. SiskCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Rank v. Hill's adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API