Legal Opinion

Supreme Housing Corp. v. Schreiber

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 31, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below, without prejudice to an action for damages.

The plaintiff waited until it had disposed of the property before this suit was commenced on the check. The check was but a substitute for a cash payment provided in the contract. . (Divine v. Divine, 58 Barb. 264.) By waiting until the full purchase price was due under the terms of the contract, before plaintiff could recover the whole purchase price, or any installment thereof, plaintiff had to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eddy v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Beecher v. . ConradtNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Ewing v. . WightmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Divine v. DivineNew York Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Gorham v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  2. Palmer v. GoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Palmer v. GoldenNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Garlock v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API