Legal Opinion
Bank of Courtland v. Long Creek Drainage Dist. No. 3
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1923No. 23691PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from circuit court of Panola county. Hon. Greek L. Bice, Judge. Suit by the Bank of Courtland against Long Creek Drainage District No. 3 of Panola county. Prom an order sustaining demurrer to declaration, and granting plaintiff an appeal to the supreme court, the plaintiff appeals. No briefs on question decided.
1Opinion of the CourtS'ykes, P. J.
The appellant bank sued the appellee drainage district for a sum of money alleged to. be due the bank by the drain*532age district. It is' unnecessary to state the averments of the declaration. There was a demurrer sustained to it, whereupon the following order was entered:
“This cause came on to be heard and considered on the demurrer to the declaration herein, and, the court having maturely considered the same, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that said demurrer be, and the same is hereby, sustained, to which action the plaintiff excepts and prays an appeal to the supreme court, which is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gulf & Ship Island Railroad v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
- Dunagin v. First National BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. Mississippi Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
- Craig v. Barber Bros. Contracting Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
- Roach v. Black Creek Drainage DistrictMississippi Supreme Court · 1949