Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Simpson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 11, 1920PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This is a libel for divorce. After the jury found the allegation of desertion to be true, and a decree was accordingly signed, the libelee filed a general motion to have the verdict set aside, and a new trial granted, on which motion the cause came before the Law Court. Case stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCorntsh, C. J.

This is a libel for divorce. The sole cause alleged is desertion. A jury trial was had under R. S., Chap. 65, Sec. 8, and in answer to submitted questions the jury found the allegation of desertion to be true and that a divorce should be granted. The presiding Justice thereupon signed the decree and the libelee then filed a general motion praying that the verdict be set aside and a new trial granted, on which motion the cause is now before the Law Court.

*15. Counsel for libelant contends at the outset that the Law Court has no authority to entertain this motion, and that the only remedy is by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scolardi v. ScolardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dow v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  3. Usen v. UsenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  4. Preston v. ReedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  5. Carroll v. CarrollSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API