Legal Opinion

Driver v. Adams

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 22, 1967No. 36176PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

By their petition for a writ of mandamus, the petitioners question the validity of various provisions of Florida’s so-called “political party loyalty oath” prescribed by Section 99.021(1), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

In effect we are asked to recede from our prior decisions in Mairs v. Peters, Fla., 52 So.2d 793 and Crowells v. Petersen, Fla., 118 So.2d 539. Petitioners insist that the rule of these cases has been superseded by principles announced in Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 87 S.Ct. 675, 17 L.Ed.2d 629 and Bond v. Floyd, 385 U.S. 116, 87 S.Ct. 339, 17 L.Ed.2d 235. We find…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bond v. FloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Mairs v. PetersSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  4. Crowells v. PetersenSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API