Driver v. Adams
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
By their petition for a writ of mandamus, the petitioners question the validity of various provisions of Florida’s so-called “political party loyalty oath” prescribed by Section 99.021(1), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.
In effect we are asked to recede from our prior decisions in Mairs v. Peters, Fla., 52 So.2d 793 and Crowells v. Petersen, Fla., 118 So.2d 539. Petitioners insist that the rule of these cases has been superseded by principles announced in Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 87 S.Ct. 675, 17 L.Ed.2d 629 and Bond v. Floyd, 385 U.S. 116, 87 S.Ct. 339, 17 L.Ed.2d 235. We find…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bond v. FloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mairs v. PetersSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Crowells v. PetersenSupreme Court of Florida · 1960