Legal Opinion

Beken v. Kingsbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1906Published

Appeal by the defendant, the F. O. Lindé Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the" county of Oneida on the 27th day of June, 1905, upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

*556The following is the opinion of the referee:

Southworth, Referee:

The undisputed facts in this case are substantially as follows:

The plaintiff, Henry Belcen, was in August, 1899, a farmer living at or near Vernon, in Orieida county. For a great many years he had been a.hop grower. In August, 1899, he had two.or three crops of hops on hand. He had his 1896 and 1897 hops.

In August, 1899, the defendant, Sherman Kingsbury, was a com- ■ mission merchant, residing in the city of Hew York, and with his place 'of business at Ho. 284 Washington street, Hew York, and had been in that business for many…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . SavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Soltau v. . GerdauNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Robinson v. WappansAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  4. Sand v. RosenagelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API