Legal Opinion

Aluminum Castings Co. v. Routzahn

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 30, 1927No. 13751PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTENHAVER, District Judge.

This action is to recover back taxes paid under protest. All jurisdictional conditions precedent are admitted. Jury trial has been waived in writing. The controversy involves the year in which should be deducted certain taxes on munitions manufactured by plaintiff. The answer turns on the proper construction of sections 12 (a) and 13 (d), Internal Revenue Act of 1916 (39 Stat. 767, 771). This act was passed and became effective September 9, 1916. During the remainder of that year, plaintiff manufactured and sold munitions, from which it derived certain profits, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Insurance Finance Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  2. Aluminum Castings Co. v. RoutzahnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  3. American Can Co. v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API