Legal Opinion

Arlene Preudhomme v. Garth Bailey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 2016No. 4D14-4553Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the Order, upon Petitioner/Former Husband’s Motion for Clarification and Enforcement of Parenting Plan, finding that the trial court .did not abuse its discretion in clarifying the parenting plan. See Pomeranz v. Pomeranz, 961 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). The wife’s Motion for Reconsideration or Rehearing of Order, on Former Husband’s Motion for Clarification and Enforcement is deemed abandoned because she filed her notice of appeal before rendition of a written order on her motion. Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i)(3) (2014 ed.) 1 ; GEICO Gen. Ins, Co. v. Williams, 111 So.3d 240, 243…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. GEICO General Insurance Co. v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Scott Ex Rel. Scott v. WOMEN'S MED. GROUP, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Romanos v. CaldwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. Goslin v. PreisserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Palamara v. Chinnock Marine, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API