Legal Opinion

State v. Roylston

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 31, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4669PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Did the respondent court exceed its jurisdiction in striking an allegation of intracount prior convictions as to each of the real parties in interest? The state, in its petition for special action, contends that it did and we agree. Since the state had no adequate remedy by appeal and extraordinary relief is warranted, we assume jurisdiction.

Donahoe was indicted on four counts of third-degree burglary, involving four different Sun Tran buses. Count I was alleged to have occurred on June 2, 1982, and the other three counts allegedly occurred on June 3, 1982. Biltoft…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. State v. RyboltCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Davis v. SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. SandsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. McDougall v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. State v. VildCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. State ex rel. McDougall v. Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API