Legal Opinion

Williamsburg Peking Corp. v. Kong

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 16, 2005No. Record 042265PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Senior Justice.

In this appeal, Williamsburg Peking Corporation (Peking) contends that the trial court erred in granting the plaintiff's motion for a nonsuit. Specifically, Peking complains that the trial court "failed to consider and rule upon [its] pending motion for sanctions against [the plaintiff] at the time the nonsuit order was granted and/or before the nonsuit order became final under Rule 1:1 ... and/or to limit the nonsuit order to permit it to do so, thereby precluding [its] claim under [Code] § 8.01-271.1."

I

On February 13, 2003, Xianchin Kong, a pro se plaintiff, filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James Ex Rel. Duncan v. JamesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  2. Dalloul v. AgbeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WoodardSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  2. City of Suffolk v. Lummis Gin Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  3. Minix v. Wells Fargo BankFairfax County Circuit Court · 2010
  4. Boyce v. PruittPatrick County Circuit Court · 2010
  5. Ey v. BlumeFairfax County Circuit Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API