Legal Opinion

Nash v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1997No. A97A0438PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

David Lee Nash appeals his conviction of burglary. On appeal, he contends he was denied his right to represent himself and his right of allocution, that his character was improperly placed in issue, and that the trial court’s charge on the burden of proof was improper. His enumerations of error do not require reversal.

1. Immediately prior to striking a jury, Nash expressed his desire to represent himself. The trial court inquired as to whether Nash understood the dangers of proceeding without counsel. After a discussion regarding Nash’s ability to represent himself, Nash…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cargill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Waddell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Malone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whatley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Hehir v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Whatley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API