Shinkle's Assignee v. Bristow
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 15 — PETITION EQUITY APPEALS PROM KENTON CHANCERY COURT. 1. The legal title of Vincent Shinkle to the property mentioned in the trust deed passed to the grantees in that deed, and therefore the separate deed of Emily Shinkle passed her dower.
Read the full summary
Case 15 — PETITION EQUITY APPEALS PROM KENTON CHANCERY COURT. 1. The legal title of Vincent Shinkle to the property mentioned in the trust deed passed to the grantees in that deed, and therefore the separate deed of Emily Shinkle passed her dower. (Gen. Stats., chap. 24, secs. 19, 20 and 21; Harrison, &c., v. Hobbs, &c., 1 Bibb, 152; Beed, ■&c., v. Welch, &e.; 11 Bush, 459.) Por a distinction between the statute relating to an assignment deed :and other deeds of trust, see Ogden v. Grant, 6 Dana, 475; Whitaker v. Blair, &c., 3 J. J. Mar., 236; Prather, &c., v. McDowell, &c., 8 Bush, 46; Ship…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PRYOR
delivebed the opinion of the cotjbt.
These two appeals being involved in the same litigation will be considered together. Vincent Shinkle in the • month of August, in the year 1888, being largely indebted, and the owner of much valuable real estate in the county of Kenton, made a deed of assignment of all his property, real and personal, to "Win. Eenley and R. T. Miller, for the payment of his debts. The assignment was general in its character, and vested in his assignees the title to his real and personal estate. The deed was put to record, and his assignees, upon investigating the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cantrill v. RiskCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blanton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1902
- Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. v. BlantonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906