Legal Opinion

Hansen v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The point sought to be raised by the defendant’s motion to quash is not before the court on this appeal. Sec. 355.09, Stats. 1947; State v. Warfield, 184 Wis. 56, 198 N. W. 854; Post v. State, 197 Wis. 457, 222 N. W. 224; Ciolocomio v. State, 198 Wis. 18, 222 N. W. 825. Although defendant was in court with his attorney several different times, no constitutional objection was asserted until after the trial had begun and the jury had been selected. There was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court, and there was no error committed in making the ruling complained of. The arresting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WarfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Post v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ciolocomio v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Collier v. County of LoganNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API