Legal Opinion

League v. Churchill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1927No. 5571PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The Court of Appeals certified the following question: “Under the act of 1894 (Ga. Laws 1894, p. 103, Code of 1910, §§ 3873-3880) can a foreign will be probated, and Geor*37gia property. willed thereunder be administered, only by such resident executor as may be named therein, or, if none, by a resident administrator with the will annexed, appointed at the instance of any heir, legatee, distributee, devisee, or creditor of the testator ? In other words, is the purpose and effect of the act of 1894 not only to require the domestic probate of foreign wills before Georgia property can be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alexandrine Mager v. Felix GrimaSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Kochersperger v. DrakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. In re MulfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Breen v. KehoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alejandro Escareno v. Noltina Crucible and Refractory Corporation, Carl Nolte Sohne GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Escareno v. Noltina Crucible & Refractory Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  3. Escareno v. Noltina CrucibleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Escareno v. Noltina CrucibleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Gibson v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API