Legal Opinion

Humboldt Township v. Long

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1876No. 728PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe District of Kansas. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strong

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe first question certified from tbe court below, is, whether tbe bonds to which tbe coupons in suit were attached are negotiable bonds, such as to entitle tbe plaintiff to tbe rights of a Iona fide bolder of negotiable paper taken in tbe ordinary course of business before maturity.

They are certificates of indebtedness to tbe railroad company, or bearer, each for §1,000, lawful money of tbe United States, payable on a day certain, with interest at the rate of seven per cent, payable annually on tbe first days of January in each year, at a specified…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Gunnison County Commissioners v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Sutliff v. Lake County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Board of Com'rs v. SutliffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. National Life Insurance v. MeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API