Legal Opinion

Sharpless Specialty Co. v. Wilson & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1924No. Appeal, No. 145Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This action was begun by foreign attachment, the writ issued against Wilson & Company. Funds belonging to *541Wilson & Co., Inc., a corporation of the State of New York, were attached. On the trial, it developed that there was no such corporate entity as “Wilson & Company” but that this was the trade name under which a combination of corporations, including Wilson & Co., Inc., the parent corporation chartered under the laws of New York, carried on business; letterheads and the sign on the office door at the main office in Chicago, which was the registered office of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennell v. GrubbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  2. Huling v. HuggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Fleisher v. BlackburnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API