Legal Opinion

In Re The Matter Of Paul Locke Partners In Care v. Will Knedlik

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 8, 2021No. 81405-2Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of No. 81405-2-I PAUL LOCKE. DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION COBURN, J. — Will Knedlik was a co-attorney-in-fact for Paul Locke under a January 2016 power of attorney. 1 Knedlik assigns error to a number of orders entered by the trial court in connection with its determination that a later power of attorney, which appointed Partners In Care (PIC) as Locke’s sole attorney-in-fact, was valid. Because Knedlik fails to support his assignments of error with meaningful analysis or citations to authority, we affirm. FACTS In August…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Norcon Builders, LLC v. GMP Homes VG, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Fuller v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API