Legal Opinion
In Re Eggers
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas
Decided April 30, 2010No. 19-10043Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING VAN ZANDT PARTIES’ SECOND MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY
CRAIG A. GARGOTTA, Bankruptcy Judge.
Came on to be considered the Van Zandt Parties’ 1 Second Motion for Relief from Stay and the Debtors’ Response. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is GRANTED.
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and § 1334. This matter is a core proceeding as defined under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G) (motions to terminate, annul, or modify the automatic stay). Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1408 and § 1409. This matter is referred to this Court under the District’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lee v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re B & L Oil Company, Debtor, Ashland Petroleum Company v. Garry R. Appel, Trustee for B & L Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- In the Matter of Alden D. Holford, Debtor. Alden D. Holford v. Melvin Lane Powers A/K/A Mel Powers and Mel Powers D/B/A Mel Powers Investment BuilderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Sapir v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Greater New York (In Re Yonkers Hamilton Sanitarium Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Oregon Ex Rel. SAIF Corp. v. Harmon (In Re Harmon)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.