Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeffrey Szur, Elaine Szur, Cary Weinstein, Vadim Kaplun, David M. Gold, Ronald D. Gray, Bertram Slutsky

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 1, 2002No. Docket 99-1517(L), 99-1556(CON), 99-1578(CON), 00-1141(CON) and 00-1142PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge.

After being found guilty by a jury of various offenses arising out of their involvement in an extensive securities fraud scheme, defendants-appellants Jeffrey Szur, Elaine Szur, Cary Weinstein, and Vadim Kaplun appeal from the judgments of conviction entered against them by the United States District Court for'the Southern District of New York (John G. Koeltl, District Judge). For the following reasons, the district court’s judgments are affirmed.

BACKGROUND

I. The Conspiracy

At the time the securities fraud conspiracy charged in the indictment began, appellant…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. United States v. RybickiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Shellef and RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Kirschner v. BennettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. United States v. LaurientiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API