Legal Opinion

Golden v. Golden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Mobile. Heard before the Hon. W. H. Tayloe. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. cited Downey v. Downey, 98 Ala. 373, 13 So Rep. 412.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The appellant Patrick Golden was divorced from his wife by a decree of the chancery court of Mobile county rendered upon decree pro confesso, and proof of the averments of the bill. At a subsequent term of the court, his wife, Mary Golden, filed the present bill, seeking to have the decree in favor of Patrick Golden set aside and annulled, and prayed for alimony. The chancery court refused to annul the decree. by which the husband was divorced, but granted alimony. Prom this decree Patrick Golden, the husband, appealed. The decree of the chancery court allowing alimony to the wife is assigned…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunklin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Downey v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Ex Parte GurganusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Torme v. TormeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Ives v. IvesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API