Legal Opinion

Celbusky v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-4726PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.

The defendant has moved to transfer this Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) action to the Middle District of Pennsylvania on the basis of forum non conveniens. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a district court is empowered to “transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought” if appropriate “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses [and] in the interest of justice”. Furthermore, a decision to transfer is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Piper Aircraft Company v. Reyno, 454…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Blender v. SibleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Bonnell v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. Nelson v. Soo Line RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  3. Tranor v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. ESTATE of LaTEEF J. DOTSON v. GARY W. GRAY TRUCKING INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  5. ESTATE of LaTEEF J. DOTSON v. GARY W. GRAY TRUCKING INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API