Heinemann v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
*482This case involving a patented invention is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Three causes of action are set forth in plaintiffs petition: patent infringement (count I); damages caused by reason of a secrecy order imposed with respect to the application for a patent for the invention and by reason of defendant’s alleged use of the patented invention (count II); and a taking under the fifth amendment (count III). In determining whether to grant defendant’s motion, we have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Bourgeois v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Sioux Tribe of Indians of the Lower Brule Reservation, South Dakota v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robert W. Heinemann v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Heinemann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- De Graffenried v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Demodulation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.