Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Olson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 12, 1966No. 34289PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Justice.

This is an appeal by Mrs. Phillip Davis, appellant, from an order of the County Judge of Okaloosa County, sitting in probate, in which order he denied the probate of a holographic will in the Estate of Mag-nus Ferdinand Olson, because it was not attested by two witnesses.

The County Judge in his order denying probate found and held, inter alia:

“ * * * and the Court being of the opinion that said holographic will is not subject to probate in the State of Florida because it was not executed within the requirements of the probate laws of the State, and that the constitutional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. PayneSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. In Re Estate of BlankenshipSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White, Garcia GlenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Allen v. DalkSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Manson v. HayesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Dalk v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Lee v. Estate PayneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API