Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LAYTON, District Judge.
Not having been present at the examination, I am in no position to say whether the witness replied “yes” or “no”. Nor does a careful reading of the transcript disclose to me that “yes” was the only sensible answer that the witness could have made under the circumstances. Thus, I have no alternative but to treat this application as one to change an answer on a material point. While the facts are different, the rule laid down by Judge Inch in De Seversky v. Republic Aviation Corporation, D.C.N.Y., 2 F.R.D. 113, 115, is controlling. There it was said in part:
“Rule 30,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Colin v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
- De Seversky v. Republic Aviation Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Downing v. GasserSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
3Cited by1 opinion
- Valley National Bank v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987