Legal Opinion

People v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Having referred defendant for a psychiatric examination, the court triggered the statutory requirement in CPL 730.20 (1) that defendant have two psychiatric examinations to determine his competency to stand trial pursuant to CPL 730.30. Thus, the court erred in failing to order a second examination (see, People v Armlin, 37 NY2d 167, 170-172; People v Mullins, 137 AD2d 227, 232, Iv denied 72 NY2d 922; People v Mulholland, 129 AD2d 857, 859).

We conclude…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ArmlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. MullinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. LoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API