Legal Opinion

Konecko v. Konecko

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1958No. Civ. 23040PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and/or minute order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss after the demurrer to his second amended complaint had been sustained and he had failed to further amend.

The question raised on appeal is whether the facts alleged in the second amended complaint are sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint attempts to state four causes of action for rescission of a property settlement agreement executed by plaintiff and his deceased wife, and one cause of action for declaratory relief.

The following is a summary of the salient facts alleged by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mesmer v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Miller v. WaldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Yost v. YostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lazorcak v. FeuersteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. People v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Silver v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Gonzalez v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Houghton v. CoberlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API