Legal Opinion
Roth v. American Colonial Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered on or about September 7, 1988, which granted that part of defendant-respondent American Colonial’s cross motion to compel compliance by the plaintiff Roth with a notice for discovery and inspection, unanimously reversed to the extent appealed from, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, to deny item 9 of the notice which requested production of the plaintiff’s State and Federal income tax returns from 1974 to the date of the notice in 1988.
This is an action by the mortgagees against the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matthews Industrial Piping Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Muller v. SorensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nanbar Realty Corp. v. Pater Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Slate v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Haenel v. NovemberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Bardi v. MosherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Nill v. Gaco W., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.