State v. Haymon

GUNN, Judge.

On his appeal from a first degree robbery conviction, defendant raises the following points: (1) error in allowing in-court identification by the victim and a photograph of the lineup as being unduly suggestive; (2) failure of the state to produce the name and address of a confidential informant; (3) the omission of the “aider and abettor” portion of MAI-CR2d 2.10. We find no reversible error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

The jury could find from the evidence that defendant and a companion entered a St. Louis grocery store. Defendant pointed a gun at a store clerk,…