Legal Opinion

Weed v. Roberts

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.

There are many difficult questions of law involved in this proceeding, and to grant the injunction asked for by the plaintiffs would be in effect to decide these questions in their favor before the trial, and this a court of equity will not do unless it be first established that it is necessary in order to prevent an irreparable injury, or that the plaintiffs have an undoubted legal right to it. The papers presented do not establish either, and, therefore, the application must be denied. My reasons for reaching this conclusion are as follows:

First. It does not appear that the act of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. . DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. People Ex Rel. Forest Commission v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. People v. . ConroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lichtstern v. J. Rosenbaum Grain Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API