Legal Opinion

Baluma, S.A., & Casino v. Mengle

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 28, 2024No. 2:20-cv-01568Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 BALUMA, S.A., Case No. 2:20-cv-01568-KJD-VCF 5 Plaintiff, ORDER – Motion to Correct Judgment 6 v. 7 BRIAN MENGLE, 8 Defendant. 9 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Correct Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 60(a), 10 or in the alternative, Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 59(e). (#49/50). 11 Defendant did not file a response in opposition, and the time to do so has passed. For the reasons 12 stated below, Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. 13 I. Factual and Procedural Background 14 Since a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blanton v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Tattersalls, Ltd. v. Jeffrey DehavenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API