D.L.J. v. B.R.J.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1DissentMurdock, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
I first note that our caselaw has always provided that a property division or an alimony in gross award, being final, non-modifiable settlements, are not available to the court in the granting of- a legal separation to the parties. E.g., Mullins v. Mullins, 416 So.2d 1063 (Ala.Civ.App.1982). *249In McLendon v. McLendon, 277 Ala. 323, 169 So.2d 767 (1964), our Supreme Court stated:
“There is a great difference in the effects of a decree a vinculo as compared with a decree a mensa. A divorce from the bonds of matrimony bars a wife of her dower and of any distributive share in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte Master Boat Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Mullins v. MullinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Adair v. AdairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- McLendon v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.