Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. Kalmanson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 23, 2000No. A00A1034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldridge, Judge.

Terry Kendrick appeals from the DeKalb County Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment to Maureen Kalmanson in her action to remove Kendrick’s lien on her property. Having reviewed the record, this Court finds that Kalmanson has established that no jury issue exists as to at least one element of accord and satisfaction as to the debt she allegedly owed Kendrick that was the underlying basis of the lien. See Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991). Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Kalmanson. Id.

The following facts are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Habachy v. Georgia Health Group, P. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. WOOD BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Simons-Eastern Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Hadson Gas Systems, Inc. v. Atlanta Airlines Terminal Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rafizadeh v. KR Snellville, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Withington v. Valuation Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. USA Manufacturing Corp. v. Perfection-Schwank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Hawthorne Grading & Hauling v. RampleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Curtin v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API