Legal Opinion

People v. Carter

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 2014No. B251727PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

When faced with making a difficult ruling or decision, some trial court judges, like anyone else, voice aloud the conflicting arguments in favor of one choice over the other. A judge’s remarks may suggest one result, yet the judge arrives at the opposite result. In such circumstances, the appellate court does not use the judge’s remarks to impeach the ruling. (People v. Borchers (1958) 50 Cal.2d 321, 329-330 [325 P.2d 97].)

But when a judge’s remarks preceding a ruling reflect a misapprehension of the law upon which that ruling is based, the appellate court must consider…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Watts, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. Mireles, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. Darley CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. People v. MirelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API