Legal Opinion

New York Dock Co. v. Flinn-O'Rourke Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

This is an action for an injunction to restrain the defendants from occupying the slip at the foot of Montague street, Brooklyn, between two of plaintiff’s piers for the construction and operation of the Whitehall Street-East Biver-Montague Street tunnel of the subway system now under construction by the city of New York under the direction of the public service commission of the first district.

There is no substantial dispute about the facts. The land under water in the slip at the foot of Montague street out to the pierhead line of 1873, except, perhaps, a narrow gore on the south side of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. White v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Consumers Coal & Ice Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. In Re the Public Service Commission for the First DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Penfield v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York Dock Co. v. Flinn-O'Rourke Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. New York Dock Co. v. Flinn-O'Rourke Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Brooklyn Trust Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API