Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Colbert

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 20, 2010No. 08-3243Published

1DissentJohn R. Gibson, Circuit Judge

Because I disagree that the facts set forth in the affidavit establish probable cause to search Colbert’s apartment for child pornography, I respectfully dissent. The majority relies upon a dangerous assumption in reaching its conclusion that the affidavit satisfies the requirements of the Fourth Amendment.

It is an inferential fallacy of ancient standing to conclude that, because members of group A (those who collect child pornography) are likely to be members of group B (those attracted to children), then group B is entirely, or even largely composed of, members of group A. Although offenses…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. FalsoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. HodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. People v. JohnSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
  5. United States v. Crespo-RiosDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API