Legal Opinion

United States v. Clarence McClain

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 19, 1991No. 89-3087PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Clarence McClain was indicted, together with eight other defendants, as the result of a federal investigation into corruption in the award of a Chicago city contract. Only he and codefendant Morgan Finley chose not to plead guilty, and *824they were tried together before a jury.1 McClain was convicted of numerous federal offenses, from which he appeals on several grounds. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

I

In 1983 the City of Chicago began to consider options for increasing city revenue. One of the methods discussed was changing its parking ticket…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. McCormick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. AbbasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Barbara E. Stefonek, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Harold Benny Jewel, Also Known as "Bear," and Arthur S. Jackson, Also Known as Stevie JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. TomblinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Foley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API