Legal Opinion

Flynn v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 14, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause having been duly considered and it appearing that the plaintiff in error was indicted with J. M. Lee and T. Hart Getzen in one count for the larceny of an automobile, the property of D. U. MeGinnes. In a second count J. M. Lee was indicted as principal and T. Hart Getzen and J. G. Flynn as accessories in the same larceny. And in the third county the three were charged with receiving the stolen property. The plaintiff in error Flynn having been tried alone was found guilty and sentenced under the second count of the indictment. As the alleged accessories were indicted with the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Potts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. State v. PeelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Hysler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Tedder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. Whiting and Farris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API