Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Preston

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This was a suit by the appellee against the appellant, on a promissory note, which was made, was payable, and was indorsed in the State of New York.

Issues were formed in the special term; there was a trial *287■by the court, a finding for the plaintiff, a motion by the defendant for a new trial overruled, and final judgment for the plaintiff. On appeal by the defendant to the general term, he assigned errors as follows: “ The appellant assigns the following errors as causes why the judgment at special term should be reversed:

“ 1. The court at special term erred in admitting the entire deposition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wesley v. MilfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Carney v. StreetIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. Indianapolis Car & Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Grisell v. Noel Bros. Flour, Feed Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Terrell v. ButterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. State ex rel. Coghlen v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API