Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. True

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 15, 2005No. Civ.A.3:02 CV 953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAYNE, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, John Yan-cey Schmitt, a Virginia state prisoner who has been sentenced to death, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his conviction in the Circuit Court for the County of Chesterfield for capital murder and the ensuing death sentence. In a Memorandum Opinion (Docket No. 80) issued on January 21, 2005, all of Schmitt’s claims for habeas relief were rejected except for the following claims:

XIV. Trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to object in a timely manner to the admission of the tape recording…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Jean Pugin v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. State v. AshbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. Jean Pugin v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  5. State v. AshbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API