Legal Opinion

Vidmar Buick Co. v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 26, 1985No. 85 C 6051PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NORDBERG, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the Motion of plaintiff Vidmar Buick Company (“Vidmar”) for Remand or, in the alternative, for Reconsideration of the State Court Order Transferring Venue. For the reasons set forth below, Vidmar’s motion is denied.

I. Removability of Vidmar’s Claim in the Initial Complaint

Vidmar contends that its claim in the initial complaint filed in state court on April 16, 1985 was removable, and that defendant General Motors Corporation (“GM”) failed to remove this claim from state court within thirty days of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Luther Weems v. Louis Dreyfus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Dorothy Quinn, Jacqueline Marchese and Nina Assajew v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Disher v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Vogel v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Graphic Scanning Corp. v. YampolDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Valspar Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API