Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Shumate

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 15, 1992No. 91-913Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

The Bankruptcy Code excludes from the bankruptcy estate property of the debtor that is subject to a restriction on transfer enforceable under “applicable nonbank-ruptcy law.” 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(2). We must decide in this case whether an anti-alienation provision contained in an ERISA-qualified pension plan constitutes a restriction on transfer enforceable under “applicable nonbankruptcy law,” and whether, accordingly, a debtor may exclude his interest in such a plan from the property of the bankruptcy estate.

I

Respondent Joseph B. Shumate, Jr., was employed for over 30 years by Coleman…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API