Legal Opinion

Wilson v. New York City Transit Authority

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided October 14, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ira B. Harkavy, J.

This is an action to recover payment for additional no-fault benefits allegedly due to plaintiff. The defendant New York City Transit Authority is the employer of the plaintiff, a bus driver, who was injured in the course of his employment on February 19, 1978. The plaintiff was admittedly entitled to both compensation benefits and no-fault benefits as a result of said accident.

After claims were filed with the defendant for both types of benefits, the New York City Transit Authority, by its letter of November 9, 1981, made an offer to settle the no-fault…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MFS/Sun Life Trust-High Yield Series v. Van Dusen Airport Services. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Krantz v. University of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Hegna v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API