Legal Opinion
State v. Nielsen
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1993No. CC C89-0964CR; CA A62544; SC S37614Published
1Opinion of the Court
853 P.2d 256 (1993)
316 Or. 611
STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,
v.
Richard Andrew NIELSEN, Petitioner on Review.
CC C89-0964CR; CA A62544; SC S37614.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted April 2, 1991.
Decided June 17, 1993.
Laura Graser, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.
Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review.
FADELEY, Justice.
Defendant was convicted of forgery after a trial to the court. An out-of-court statement of defendant's accomplice, Shelly Rimer, was admitted in evidence under…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.