Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1971No. Civ. 12848PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PIERCE, J. *

Petitioner James R. Stephens appeals from an order of respondent board denying reconsideration of findings of a referee (approved by the board) against petitioner. Petitioner, while employed at Folsom State Prison, suffered a condition of atherosclerosis which was disabling to some extent not determined. The basis of the order of the board was that petitioner’s condition was not work induced. That conclusion rested upon a medical opinion which petitioner argues did not constitute substantial evidence—as opposed to the opinion of a cardiologist to the contrary which did.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Place v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Michon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Saal v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Medlin v. County of Henrico PoliceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  5. Muznik v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API