Legal Opinion

Fontenot v. Sun Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1970No. 2973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

These proceedings are an aftermath of our decision in Fontenot v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company, La.App., 197 So.2d 715. The trial court had cancelled two mineral leases in their entirety. On appeal, we amended so as to except from the cancellation the plaintiff Fontenot’s mineral interest in two specified sands.

The question at issue in the present proceeding is whether our amendment is also effective as to three overriding royalty owners. The latter had been made defendants in the original proceedings; but they had failed to appeal from the original trial court decree…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Wier v. GlassellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  3. Fontenot v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Humble Oil and Refining Company v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  5. Arkansas Fuel Oil Company v. GarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Sun Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. Fontenot v. Sun Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  3. Fontenot v. Sun Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API