Legal Opinion
United States v. Kahaner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 4, 1962PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The Government’s consent to a severance of the indictment as to the defendants Erdman and Moore dissolves most of the problems stressed in support of the renewed motions for separate trials made by the defendants Kahaner and Keogh. The Government states that it is ready to proceed to trial against the three remaining defendants, Kahaner, Keogh and Corallo. Keogh, however, presses for an individual trial, separate and apart from Kahaner and Corallo. But nothing contained either in his present or prior motion papers suggests that in the changed posture of the case a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stroble v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Don C. Silverthorne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Joseph Armone, Stephen Grammauta, Vincent Pacelli, and Nicholas ViscardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Walter Augustus Bowe, Robert Steele Collier, and Khaleel Sultarn SayyedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. MandelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.