Legal Opinion

Page Mach. Co. v. Dow

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 16, 1909No. 147Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The Circuit Court, inter alia, held that all of the claims of the Joy patent, No. 780,664, were valid and infringed. Upon a rehearing this decision' was modified by giving to claim 12 of that patent a broader construction than at first, and, as thus construed, finding anticipation in a prior patent. Interlocutory decree for injunction and accounting on the other claims was entered accordingly. Defendant appealed from so much of the decree as held these claims valid and infringed. Complainant could not appeal from so much of the decree as dismissed the bill…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Ex Parte National Enameling and Stamping CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Gage v. HerringSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Electrical Accumulator Co. v. Julien Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API